Defining relation
Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE
Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.
高二選擇性必修 第二册(A版).pdf · 4.4 · PDF 49 / printed page 44
Revisit first: Arithmetic sequencesGeometric sequences
TOPIC 01
Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.
PREDICT → EXPLORE → EXPLAIN → TRANSFER
Lesson question: Can a correct induction step rescue a false or missing base case?
Model exploration: predict which displayed result changes with the parameters, check the values, and compare the observation with the lesson question.
For n=4, the odd-number sum equals n². The false formula n²+1 has exactly the same increment 2n+1 but fails its base case when c≠0. Finite checks alone are not an induction proof.
Explain: Calculate two valid cases and explain the change using the defining relation.
Transfer: Identify the failed link in a proposed proof and repair the domain or argument.
Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The next shifted term includes the fixed constant.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The next shifted term includes the fixed constant.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The explicit base check and the induction step cover only the stated domain.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The explicit base check and the induction step cover only the stated domain.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Find one valid counterexample.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The next shifted term includes the fixed constant.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The next shifted term includes the fixed constant.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The newly added odd term is 2k+1, not 2k−1.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The newly added odd term is 2k+1, not 2k−1.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
At n terms the highest exponent is n−1.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: At n terms the highest exponent is n−1.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both the base and the increment are multiples of three.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both the base and the increment are multiples of three.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both the base and the increment are multiples of three.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both the base and the increment are multiples of three.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The explicit base check and the induction step cover only the stated domain.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The explicit base check and the induction step cover only the stated domain.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The constant factor remains in the added term and target.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The constant factor remains in the added term and target.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Find one valid counterexample.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The constant factor remains in the added term and target.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The constant factor remains in the added term and target.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Find one valid counterexample.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Review your latest checked answers and explanations. A draft change requires a fresh check. Written work needs your self-assessment or a teacher’s review.
Enable JavaScript for a summary of your local work.