← Senior Mathematics Studio

LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE

Disprove the claim that n²+n+t is prime for every nonnegative integer n.

Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.

Return to the lesson / paper ↗

高二選擇性必修 第二册(A版).pdf · 4.4 · PDF 49 / printed page 44

Revisit first: Arithmetic sequencesGeometric sequences

TOPIC 01

Mathematical induction

Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.

What you will be able to explain

  • Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
  • Justify the method and check the conditions in a new situation.

Try it. Leave your reasoning visible.

Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.

01 / Standard#Your turn

Disprove the claim that n²+n+t is prime for every nonnegative integer n.

t=12t=12
  • Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.
Skills and prerequisite lessons

Working and explanation

BUILD THE REASONING

Hint 1
Find one valid counterexample.
Hint 2
Try n=t.
Worked solution
  1. Find one valid counterexample.

  2. Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.

    n=12⇒n2+n+t=12(14)n=12 ⇒ n^2+n+t=12(14)
  3. Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.

The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.

n=12:n2+n+t=12⋅14n=12:n^2+n+t=12·14

Checks and common pitfalls: Both factors exceed one, so the expression is composite.

Reasoning checklist · self / teacher assessment
  • State a valid definition or model and its assumptions.
  • Show the intermediate mathematical relations, not only the final claim.
  • Check exclusions, units or the interpretation of the result.

Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.

Focus on one question

Teacher preparation and assessment

Question sequence

  • Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
  • Which condition is essential in mathematical induction?
  • Can a correct induction step rescue a false or missing base case?

Board plan

  • Defining relation: Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
    P(n0)∧[P(k)⇒P(k+1)]P(n_0)\land[P(k)\Rightarrow P(k+1)]
  • Conditions: Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.

Anticipated thinking

  • Checking many examples does not establish the induction step.

Assessment checklist

  • 1 mark: choose the correct representation and conditions.
  • 1 mark: establish the intermediate relation.
  • 1 mark: complete a connected calculation or proof.
  • 1 mark: interpret and check the conclusion.

No sign-in. Work stays in this browser. Export before clearing browser data. Written reasoning is assessed with a checklist.

Curriculum and source notes ↗