← Senior Mathematics Studio

LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE

Prove the finite power-of-two identity.

Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.

Return to the lesson / paper ↗

高二選擇性必修 第二册(A版).pdf · 4.4 · PDF 49 / printed page 44

Revisit first: Arithmetic sequencesGeometric sequences

TOPIC 01

Mathematical induction

Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.

What you will be able to explain

  • Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
  • Justify the method and check the conditions in a new situation.

Try it. Leave your reasoning visible.

Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.

01 / Foundation#Your turn

Prove the finite power-of-two identity.

1+2+⋯+2n−1=2n−11+2+\cdots+2^{n-1}=2^n-1
  • Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.
Skills and prerequisite lessons

Working and explanation

BUILD THE REASONING

Hint 1
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Hint 2
Use this intermediate relation.
Sk+1=Sk+2kS_{k+1}=S_k+2^k
Worked solution
  1. Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.

  2. Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.

    n=1: 1=2−1n=1:\ 1=2-1
  3. Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.

    Sk+1=2k−1+2k=2k+1−1S_{k+1}=2^k-1+2^k=2^{k+1}-1
  4. At n terms the highest exponent is n−1.

The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.

Sn=2n−1S_n=2^n-1

Checks and common pitfalls: At n terms the highest exponent is n−1.

Reasoning checklist · self / teacher assessment
  • State a valid definition or model and its assumptions.
  • Show the intermediate mathematical relations, not only the final claim.
  • Check exclusions, units or the interpretation of the result.

Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.

Focus on one question

Teacher preparation and assessment

Question sequence

  • Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
  • Which condition is essential in mathematical induction?
  • Can a correct induction step rescue a false or missing base case?

Board plan

  • Defining relation: Build proofs with a verified base, an explicit induction hypothesis and a valid step.
    P(n0)∧[P(k)⇒P(k+1)]P(n_0)\land[P(k)\Rightarrow P(k+1)]
  • Conditions: Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.

Anticipated thinking

  • Checking many examples does not establish the induction step.

Assessment checklist

  • 1 mark: choose the correct representation and conditions.
  • 1 mark: establish the intermediate relation.
  • 1 mark: complete a connected calculation or proof.
  • 1 mark: interpret and check the conclusion.

No sign-in. Work stays in this browser. Export before clearing browser data. Written reasoning is assessed with a checklist.

Curriculum and source notes ↗