← Senior Mathematics Studio

LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE

Prove the scaled telescoping identity by induction.

Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.

TOPIC 01

Sequences: mixed review

A mixed assessment: identify the method, justify it and revise your reasoning.

What you will be able to explain

  • Connect the chapter skills without relying on the order of the exercises.

Try it. Leave your reasoning visible.

Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.

01 / Standard#Your turn

Prove the scaled telescoping identity by induction.

∑j=1n31/[j(j+1)]=31n/(n+1)\sum_{j=1}^n31/[j(j+1)]=31n/(n+1)
  • Induction proves a statement only for the specified integer domain starting at the base case.
Skills and prerequisite lessons

Working and explanation

BUILD THE REASONING

Hint 1
Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.
Hint 2
Use this intermediate relation.
S(k+1)=S(k)+t/[(k+1)(k+2)]S(k+1)=S(k)+t/[(k+1)(k+2)]
Worked solution
  1. Verify the base case, assume the claim at k, and prove it at k+1.

  2. Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.

    n=1:31/2=31/2n=1:31/2=31/2
  3. Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.

    Sk+1=31k/(k+1)+31/[(k+1)(k+2)]=31(k+1)/(k+2)S_{k+1}=31k/(k+1)+31/[(k+1)(k+2)]=31(k+1)/(k+2)
  4. The constant factor remains in the added term and target.

The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.

Sn=31n/(n+1)S_n=31n/(n+1)

Checks and common pitfalls: The constant factor remains in the added term and target.

Reasoning checklist · self / teacher assessment
  • State a valid definition or model and its assumptions.
  • Show the intermediate mathematical relations, not only the final claim.
  • Check exclusions, units or the interpretation of the result.

Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.

Focus on one question

Teacher preparation and assessment

Question sequence

  • Ask students to name the relevant condition before calculating.

Board plan

  • Compare valid methods and annotate their conditions.

Anticipated thinking

  • A correct final value may still hide a missing assumption.

Assessment checklist

  • Check the method, conditions, reasoning and interpretation separately.

No sign-in. Work stays in this browser. Export before clearing browser data. Written reasoning is assessed with a checklist.

Curriculum and source notes ↗