← Senior Mathematics Studio

LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE

Explain the projection criterion: a line in a plane is perpendicular to an oblique line exactly when it is perpendicular to its nonzero orthogonal projection.

Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.

Return to the lesson / paper ↗

高一必修 第二册(A版).pdf · 8.6 · PDF 153 / printed page 146

Revisit first: Parallel lines and planes in space

TOPIC 01

Perpendicular lines and planes in space

Build understanding of perpendicular lines and planes in space through definitions, contrasting cases and justified applications.

What you will be able to explain

  • Use definitions, valid spatial reasoning and metric checks for perpendicular lines and planes in space.
  • Connect representations and justify the steps, including boundary cases.
  • Explain a solution and apply the idea to a changed situation.

Try it. Leave your reasoning visible.

Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.

01 / Transfer#Worked example

Explain the projection criterion: a line in a plane is perpendicular to an oblique line exactly when it is perpendicular to its nonzero orthogonal projection.

v=p+n\mathbf v=\mathbf p+\mathbf n
  • Use the domain, units and sampling assumptions stated in the question.
Skills and prerequisite lessons

Working and explanation

BUILD THE REASONING

Hint 1
Use perpendicularity tests with intersecting directions, then identify the relevant projection or section.
Hint 2
Resolve the oblique vector into in-plane and normal components.
Worked solution
  1. Use perpendicularity tests with intersecting directions, then identify the relevant projection or section.

  2. Calculate or simplify this relation.

    u⋅v=u⋅p+u⋅n=u⋅p\mathbf u\cdot\mathbf v=\mathbf u\cdot\mathbf p+\mathbf u\cdot\mathbf n=\mathbf u\cdot\mathbf p
  3. A nonzero projection is required to speak of its direction.

The normal component has zero dot product with every in-plane direction, leaving the projection component.

Checks and common pitfalls: A nonzero projection is required to speak of its direction.

Reasoning checklist · self / teacher assessment
  • State the relevant definition, condition or model.
  • Show a valid calculation, proof or counterexample.
  • Interpret the conclusion with its restrictions.

Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.

Focus on one question

Teacher preparation and assessment

Question sequence

  • What must be true before using the main rule for perpendicular lines and planes in space?
  • Which representation makes this task easier, and why?
  • Change one assumption. Does the conclusion survive?

Board plan

  • Use definitions, valid spatial reasoning and metric checks for perpendicular lines and planes in space.
  • Line-plane test: Perpendicularity to two intersecting in-plane lines proves perpendicularity to the plane.
  • Angles and distances: Use orthogonal projections for line-plane angles and perpendicular sections for dihedral angles.
  • Close with: conditions → representation → reasoning → check.

Anticipated thinking

  • Expected reasoning: Perpendicularity to two intersecting in-plane lines proves perpendicularity to the plane.
  • Expected reasoning: Use orthogonal projections for line-plane angles and perpendicular sections for dihedral angles.
  • Expected correction: Perpendicular planes do not make every contained line perpendicular to the other plane.

Assessment checklist

  • 1: identify the givens and required quantity.
  • 1: choose a valid definition, representation or method.
  • 1: present connected, correct reasoning.
  • 1: check conditions and explain the result.

No sign-in. Work stays in this browser. Export before clearing browser data. Written reasoning is assessed with a checklist.

Curriculum and source notes ↗