Model or definition
Divide polynomials and choose decomposition numerators matched to each denominator factor.
LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE
Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.
2027 JM01 考試大綱 · 4. Polynomial and rational fractions · PDF 2 / printed page 2
Revisit first: Function concept and representations
TOPIC 01
Divide polynomials and choose decomposition numerators matched to each denominator factor.
Divide polynomials and choose decomposition numerators matched to each denominator factor.
Record all original excluded roots. Divide improper fractions first; a repeated factor needs every power.
PREDICT → EXPLORE → EXPLAIN → TRANSFER
Lesson question: Can a canceled factor still create a missing point in the graph?
Model exploration: predict which displayed result changes with the parameters, check the values, and compare the observation with the lesson question.
The difference is 2ab=4. Equality holds exactly when ab=0.
Explain: Compare two admissible cases and explain their different results using the stated model.
Transfer: Compare equality as rational expressions with equality of functions on their original domains.
Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The remainder theorem evaluates at the zero of the divisor.
The requested value is 6.
Checks and common pitfalls: The remainder theorem evaluates at the zero of the divisor.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both x and x² terms appear; omitting one cannot match the numerator.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both x and x² terms appear; omitting one cannot match the numerator.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The remainder theorem evaluates at the zero of the divisor.
The requested value is 9.
Checks and common pitfalls: The remainder theorem evaluates at the zero of the divisor.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The original domain excludes x=0.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The original domain excludes x=0.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Compare polynomial identities after multiplying denominators; the rational identity still excludes 0 and −1.
The requested value is 7.
Checks and common pitfalls: Compare polynomial identities after multiplying denominators; the rational identity still excludes 0 and −1.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Evaluating the cleared polynomial identity at x=1 is permitted even though the original fraction excludes that input.
The requested value is 4.5.
Checks and common pitfalls: Evaluating the cleared polynomial identity at x=1 is permitted even though the original fraction excludes that input.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Evaluating the cleared polynomial identity at x=1 is permitted even though the original fraction excludes that input.
The requested value is 5.
Checks and common pitfalls: Evaluating the cleared polynomial identity at x=1 is permitted even though the original fraction excludes that input.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Both x and x² terms appear; omitting one cannot match the numerator.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: Both x and x² terms appear; omitting one cannot match the numerator.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
A polynomial part is needed before partial fractions of an improper fraction.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: A polynomial part is needed before partial fractions of an improper fraction.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
A polynomial part is needed before partial fractions of an improper fraction.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: A polynomial part is needed before partial fractions of an improper fraction.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: The simplified expression agrees on the shared domain but does not fill the hole in f.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Review your latest checked answers and explanations. A draft change requires a fresh check. Written work needs your self-assessment or a teacher’s review.
Enable JavaScript for a summary of your local work.