Model or definition
Draw a feasible region and optimise a linear objective, then check integer restrictions when required.
LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE
Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.
T04高二理組數學思維本(2026).pdf · III. Simple linear programming · PDF 11 / printed page 10
Revisit first: Equations of a line
TOPIC 01
Draw a feasible region and optimise a linear objective, then check integer restrictions when required.
Draw a feasible region and optimise a linear objective, then check integer restrictions when required.
A vertex search needs a nonempty bounded polygon or a justified finite optimum; integer solutions may differ from continuous optima.
PREDICT → EXPLORE → EXPLAIN → TRANSFER
Lesson question: Must rounding a continuous optimum preserve feasibility?
Model exploration: predict which displayed result changes with the parameters, check the values, and compare the observation with the lesson question.
x≥0, y≥0, x+y≤6; maximise 2x+1y. Vertex values: 0, 12, 6; maximum=12. If a=b, the whole sloping edge is optimal. Additional integer constraints must be checked separately.
Explain: Compare two admissible cases and explain their different results using the stated model.
Transfer: Compare vertex optimisation with explicit enumeration of nearby integer points.
Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The boundary is included by the non-strict inequality.
The requested value is 1.
Checks and common pitfalls: The boundary is included by the non-strict inequality.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
No resource constraint blocks growth along the feasible ray.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: No resource constraint blocks growth along the feasible ray.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
The requested value is 12.
Checks and common pitfalls: Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The boundary is included by the non-strict inequality.
The requested value is 1.
Checks and common pitfalls: The boundary is included by the non-strict inequality.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Every point on the upper boundary attains the same optimum.
The requested value is 6.
Checks and common pitfalls: Every point on the upper boundary attains the same optimum.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The x-resource receives the larger objective coefficient.
The requested value is 14.
Checks and common pitfalls: The x-resource receives the larger objective coefficient.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
An unbounded region can still have a finite minimum.
The requested value is 8.
Checks and common pitfalls: An unbounded region can still have a finite minimum.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
An unbounded region can still have a finite minimum.
The requested value is 9.
Checks and common pitfalls: An unbounded region can still have a finite minimum.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
No resource constraint blocks growth along the feasible ray.
The requested relation or conclusion is shown below.
Checks and common pitfalls: No resource constraint blocks growth along the feasible ray.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The integer optimum differs from the continuous boundary value t+1/2.
The requested value is 11.
Checks and common pitfalls: The integer optimum differs from the continuous boundary value t+1/2.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
The requested value is 36.
Checks and common pitfalls: Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
The integer optimum differs from the continuous boundary value t+1/2.
The requested value is 13.
Checks and common pitfalls: The integer optimum differs from the continuous boundary value t+1/2.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Working and explanation
BUILD THE REASONING
Write the defining equation, retain exclusions, and then solve or compare.
Apply the stated relation and retain its conditions.
Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
The requested value is 42.
Checks and common pitfalls: Compare profit per resource; distinguish the stated continuous model from an integer production model.
Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.
Review your latest checked answers and explanations. A draft change requires a fresh check. Written work needs your self-assessment or a teacher’s review.
Enable JavaScript for a summary of your local work.