← Senior Mathematics Studio

LEARN · EXPLAIN · REVISE

The probability of each component failing is 1/(k+1), but common power failures can affect both. Can the independent-series formula be used without further evidence?

Read the idea, work independently, then explain what changed.

Return to the lesson / paper ↗

高一必修 第二册(A版).pdf · 10.2 · PDF 256 / printed page 249

Revisit first: Random events and probability

TOPIC 01

Independence of events

Build understanding of independence of events through definitions, contrasting cases and justified applications.

What you will be able to explain

  • Use independence of events to state a justified conclusion.
  • Connect representations and justify the steps, including boundary cases.
  • Explain a solution and apply the idea to a changed situation.

Try it. Leave your reasoning visible.

Use one hint at a time. A correction explains what changed, not just the final answer.

01 / Standard#Your turn

The probability of each component failing is 1/(k+1), but common power failures can affect both. Can the independent-series formula be used without further evidence?

k=3k=3
  • Use the domain, units and sampling assumptions stated in the question.
Skills and prerequisite lessons

Working and explanation

BUILD THE REASONING

Hint 1
Use independence only when justified and keep it distinct from disjointness.
Hint 2
Inspect shared causes, not just marginal probabilities.
Worked solution
  1. Use independence only when justified and keep it distinct from disjointness.

  2. Calculate or simplify this relation.

    P(A∩B)≠P(A)P(B) in generalP(A\cap B)\ne P(A)P(B)\text{ in general}
  3. A numerical marginal rate does not establish independence.

No; a shared cause may create dependence.

Checks and common pitfalls: A numerical marginal rate does not establish independence.

Reasoning checklist · self / teacher assessment
  • State the relevant definition, condition or model.
  • Show a valid calculation, proof or counterexample.
  • Interpret the conclusion with its restrictions.

Think first. Reveal a hint when the class is ready.

Focus on one question

Teacher preparation and assessment

Question sequence

  • What must be true before using the main rule for independence of events?
  • Which representation makes this task easier, and why?
  • Change one assumption. Does the conclusion survive?

Board plan

  • Use independence of events to state a justified conclusion.
  • Independence: Independent events satisfy the product rule.
    P(A∩B)=P(A)P(B)P(A\cap B)=P(A)P(B)
  • Model check: Shared causes and sampling without replacement can create dependence.
  • Close with: conditions → representation → reasoning → check.

Anticipated thinking

  • Expected reasoning: Independent events satisfy the product rule.
  • Expected reasoning: Shared causes and sampling without replacement can create dependence.
  • Expected correction: Known marginal probabilities do not establish independence.

Assessment checklist

  • 1: identify the givens and required quantity.
  • 1: choose a valid definition, representation or method.
  • 1: present connected, correct reasoning.
  • 1: check conditions and explain the result.

No sign-in. Work stays in this browser. Export before clearing browser data. Written reasoning is assessed with a checklist.

Curriculum and source notes ↗