Does “10% off, then subtract 20” cost the same as “subtract 20, then 10% off”?
My prediction and reason
For an original price x ≥ 100, predict which discount order is cheaper. The threshold applies to the original price only; both operations may then use the intermediate amount.
Evidence and observations
Let D(u) = 0.9u and C(u) = u − 20. At original prices 100 and 200, record the intermediate and final amounts for C(D(x)) and D(C(x)).
Derive both formulas and subtract them. Record whether the saving depends on the original price under this model.
Given f(2x + 1) = 6x + 5 for every real x, set t = 2x + 1. Record x in terms of t and rewrite the entire identity.
Explain or give a counterexample
Transfer
Recover h(x) from h(3x − 2) = 6x + 1 for every real x. Then compare the two discount orders with a subtraction of 30 instead of 20; justify the difference algebraically.
Exit task
An original price is 100 and qualifies for both operations under the original-price-only rule. Compare 10% off then subtract 20 with subtract 20 then 10% off. Explain the general saving.
5 min predict discount order; 12 min track prices and derive the difference; 8 min connect to substitution; 12 min paper composition and change of variable; 3 min exit check.
Does “10% off, then subtract 20” cost the same as “subtract 20, then 10% off”?
For an original price x ≥ 100, predict which discount order is cheaper. The threshold applies to the original price only; both operations may then use the intermediate amount.
Evidence tasks
- Let D(u) = 0.9u and C(u) = u − 20. At original prices 100 and 200, record the intermediate and final amounts for C(D(x)) and D(C(x)).
- Derive both formulas and subtract them. Record whether the saving depends on the original price under this model.
- Given f(2x + 1) = 6x + 5 for every real x, set t = 2x + 1. Record x in terms of t and rewrite the entire identity.
Reference reasoning
Composition replaces the complete input of the outer rule. Here C(D(x)) = 0.9x − 20 and D(C(x)) = 0.9x − 18, so discounting first is 2 cheaper for every original x ≥ 100. The eligibility condition is on the original price only; it is not reapplied to intermediate amounts in this activity. To recover f from f(2x + 1), use the reversible substitution t = 2x + 1, hence x = (t − 1)/2. Since t covers all reals, f(t) = 3t + 2 determines the full real rule. If an identity were given only on a restricted x-domain, the recovered t-domain would also need to be restricted.
Find the composite expression, expanding the entire squared input.
f(x)=x2+1,g(x)=2x−1;f(g(x)) - Substitute g(x) as one complete input: f(g(x)) = (2x − 1)² + 1.
- Expand to obtain 4x² − 4x + 2.
Recover f(x) from an identity valid for every real x.
f(2x+1)=6x+5(x∈R) - Set t = 2x + 1, so x = (t − 1)/2 and t ranges over R.
- f(t) = 6(t − 1)/2 + 5 = 3t + 2. Rename the input to obtain f(x) = 3x + 2.
Transfer and exit task
Recover h(x) from h(3x − 2) = 6x + 1 for every real x. Then compare the two discount orders with a subtraction of 30 instead of 20; justify the difference algebraically.
An original price is 100 and qualifies for both operations under the original-price-only rule. Compare 10% off then subtract 20 with subtract 20 then 10% off. Explain the general saving.
Discount then subtract: 90 − 20 = 70. Subtract then discount: 80 × 0.9 = 72. In general the formulas are 0.9x − 20 and 0.9x − 18, so the first order saves 2.
- Tracks the intermediate amount and respects the stated original-price eligibility rule.
- Uses general formulas to establish the constant saving, rather than extrapolating from one price.
Questions
- Is the discount threshold checked on the original amount or after each operation in this model?
- When t = 2x + 1, which values of t can actually be reached?
Expected responses
- Students may square only 2x. Keep (2x − 1) inside brackets until expansion.
- Students may write f(x) = 6x + 5 directly. Match the whole input before renaming variables.
Confusions
- Do not silently introduce a second eligibility check on the intermediate price.
- The recovered rule is determined only on the image of the given inner input map.
Board plan
- Composition: substitute the whole inner expression.
- Change of variable: t = 2x + 1 ↔ x = (t − 1)/2.
- Eligibility here: original x ≥ 100, checked once; order changes the final amount.